๐Ÿฆ  Sepsis & Septic Shock

SSC 2026 โœฆ Latest ISCCM 2020 ESICM
Emergency SSC 2026 โ€” 129 Recommendations Marino 5th Ed (2025, Ch.14,17) ยท SSC 2026 ยท Washington Manual 4th Ed ยท ISCCM 2020
๐Ÿ“… Last reviewed July 2026 ยท Next review January 2027 ยท Compiled by Dr. Anmol Srivastava Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine & Critical Care Medicine ยท Reviewed by Dr. Tanya Chawla Anaesthesia & Critical Care
๐Ÿ“˜ 1 ยท Washington Manual of Critical Care, 4th Ed

Washington Manual Summary

"Sepsis is a medical emergency requiring immediate and simultaneous diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic intervention. Every hour of delay in appropriate antibiotic therapy increases mortality by approximately 7%."

Washington Manual of Critical Care, 4th Ed. (Kollef & Witt, eds.) Wolters Kluwer 2023. Chapter: Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Clinical Synopsis

  • Sepsis: Life-threatening acute organ dysfunction from dysregulated host response to infection. SOFA โ‰ฅ2 from baseline = sepsis. Hospital mortality ~10โ€“30%.
  • Septic Shock: Sepsis requiring vasopressors to maintain MAP โ‰ฅ65 mmHg AND lactate >2 mmol/L despite adequate resuscitation. Mortality >40%.
  • Recognition: Use NEWS2/MEWS/SIRS (not qSOFA alone) for screening โ€” SSC 2026 Strong recommendation.
  • Epidemiology: ~49 million cases/year worldwide; 13 million sepsis-related deaths annually. Leading cause of ICU mortality in India. Most common sources: urinary, pneumonia, abdominal, bacteraemia.
  • Time-sensitive: Every 30 min delay in antibiotics measurably increases mortality. Treat as urgently as STEMI.

Diagnostic Criteria at a Glance

ToolVariablesThresholdUse
SOFAResp, Coag, Liver, CVS, CNS, Renal (0โ€“4 pts each)โ‰ฅ2 from baseline = SepsisDiagnoses sepsis; each point โ†‘ mortality ~10%
NEWS2RR, SpOโ‚‚, Oโ‚‚, SBP, HR, Consciousness, Tempโ‰ฅ5 = high riskBest screening โ€” SSC 2026 Strong rec over qSOFA
qSOFARR โ‰ฅ22 | GCS <15 | SBP โ‰ค100โ‰ฅ2 pointsPrognostic only โ€” NOT for sepsis screening (SSC 2026)
LactateSerum lactate (mmol/L)>2 = septic shock; >4 = very high riskSeptic shock criterion; clearance โ‰ฅ10%/2h = goal
๐Ÿ“— 2 ยท Marino's The ICU Book, 5th Edition (2025)

Marino Physiology โ€” Why Sepsis Kills

๐Ÿ”ฌ How sepsis progresses to multi-organ failure
TriggerInfection โ€” microbial invasion (PAMPs recognised by the host)
Neutrophil activation โ†’ respiratory burst & reactive oxygen speciesoxidant injury spills onto host endothelium
Dysregulated cytokine surge โ€” TNF-ฮฑ, IL-1, IL-6 ("malignant inflammation")
Endothelial NO โ†’ vasodilatation + capillary leakโ†“โ†“ SVR & hypovolaemia โ€” warm/hyperdynamic shock
Mitochondrial dysfunctionimpaired Oโ‚‚ utilisation (cytopathic hypoxia); lactate rises
Microcirculatory failure + splanchnic hypoperfusion โ†’ gut-barrier failure
Pathological stateMulti-organ dysfunction โ€” AKI, ARDS, septic cardiomyopathy, encephalopathy

"The mortality rate in sepsis is not related to the causative organism, including multidrug-resistant organisms. This observation is consistent with the notion that the major problem in sepsis is not the infection, but the host response to infection."

Marino PL. The ICU Book, 5th Ed. Ch.17: Inflammatory Shock Syndromes. Wolters Kluwer; 2025. p.305

Step 1 โ€” Neutrophil Activation and the Respiratory Burst

๐Ÿ“— Marino Ch.17, p.300โ€“303

Invading microbes trigger circulating neutrophils โ†’ respiratory burst (20-fold โ†‘ in Oโ‚‚ consumption, lasting 15โ€“20 min). NADPH oxidase activates โ†’ generates reactive oxygen species (ROS): superoxide radical โ†’ hydrogen peroxide โ†’ hypochlorite. ROS kill microbes but also damage the host's vascular endothelium, proteins, lipids, and DNA = oxidant injury.

Critical insight: this inflammatory injury can become self-sustaining (malignant inflammation) โ€” injury triggers more inflammation โ†’ multi-organ failure cascade.

Step 2 โ€” Haemodynamic Consequences (Hyperdynamic/Warm Shock)

๐Ÿ“— Marino Ch.17, p.305โ€“307
  • Proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-ฮฑ, IL-1, IL-6) โ†’ endothelial NO release โ†’ profound vasodilation โ†’ โ†“โ†“ SVR โ€” the dominant haemodynamic lesion
  • Oxidant injury to endothelium โ†’ capillary leak โ†’ hypovolaemia (fluid leaves the intravascular compartment)
  • Cardiac output is typically increased (tachycardia + โ†“ afterload) โ€” this defines "warm/hyperdynamic shock"
  • Splanchnic blood flow reduced despite โ†‘ overall CO โ†’ gut mucosal disruption โ†’ bacterial translocation โ†’ worsens sepsis
  • Late sepsis โ†’ cytokine-mediated septic cardiomyopathy โ†’ โ†“ CO โ†’ poor prognosis

Step 3 โ€” The Critical Insight: Mitochondrial Dysfunction

๐Ÿ“— Marino Ch.17, p.307 โ€” "Two Very Important Implications"

Organ dysfunction in sepsis results from mitochondrial dysfunction: oxidative damage to the electron transport chain + cytokine inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase โ†’ โ†“ mitochondrial Oโ‚‚ consumption โ†’ โ†‘ tissue POโ‚‚ (paradoxically elevated Oโ‚‚ in skeletal muscle). Marino cites direct measurements showing elevated muscle POโ‚‚ in severe sepsis patients.

Implication 1 (Marino, p.307): Since tissue Oโ‚‚ levels are NOT impaired in septic shock, the liberal use of supplemental Oโ‚‚ to "promote tissue oxygenation" is not justified, and could be harmful (by promoting oxidant stress).

Implication 2 (Marino, p.307): Elevated plasma lactate in septic shock is NOT the result of inadequate tissue oxygenation. Lactate is an alternative energy source during metabolic stress. Therefore ScvOโ‚‚ is inappropriately elevated in sepsis (โ†“ Oโ‚‚ extraction from microcirculation) and is unreliable as a resuscitation endpoint.

Step 4 โ€” Organ Failure Cascade (Marino Table 17.1)

Organ SystemClinical ConditionMechanism
BrainSeptic encephalopathyMicroglial activation, BBB disruption, neurotransmitter imbalance
Bone MarrowAnaemia of critical illnessInflammatory suppression of erythropoiesis
Heart/VasculatureSeptic shock, cardiomyopathyCytokine-mediated systolic + diastolic dysfunction
KidneysAcute Kidney Injury (AKI)Endothelial dysfunction, microvascular coagulation
LungsARDSNeutrophil-mediated alveolar capillary injury
Peripheral NervesCritical illness polyneuropathyAxonal degeneration from microvascular disease
Skeletal MuscleICU-acquired weaknessRhabdomyolysis, critical illness myopathy

Mortality rises directly with number of organ failures: each additional organ failing adds ~15โ€“20% absolute mortality (Marino Figure 17.2 โ€” data from US and European surveys).

๐Ÿ“‹ 3 ยท SSC 2026 โ€” International Guidelines

Latest Guideline Recommendations

Prescott HC, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2026. Crit Care Med. 2026;54(4):725โ€“812 | 129 statements | Evidence through June 2025

A. Screening

Statement 4 Strong ยท Moderate certainty
Use NEWS, NEWS2, MEWS, or SIRS over qSOFA as a single screening tool. Upgraded from 2021

B. Fluid Resuscitation

Statement 10 Conditional ยท Low certainty
At least 30 mL/kg IV crystalloid in first 3 hours if hypoperfusion or lactate โ‰ฅ4 mmol/L. (In BMI >30: calculate using adjusted/ideal body weight)
Statement 44 Conditional ยท Moderate certainty
Balanced crystalloids over 0.9% saline. Upgraded from Low certainty | Exception: TBI โ†’ 0.9% saline
Statement 45 Conditional ยท Moderate certainty
Crystalloids ALONE over albumin. Changed from 2021 | Exception: large crystalloid volumes already given; cirrhosis. Avoid albumin in TBI.
Statement 89 Conditional ยท Very low certainty NEW 2026
After acute resuscitation phase: active fluid removal (diuretics; if insufficient โ†’ ultrafiltration) to achieve deresuscitation.

C. Vasopressors

Statement 13 Strong ยท Moderate certainty
Initial MAP target โ‰ฅ65 mmHg. New remark: range ยฑ5 mmHg acceptable (60โ€“70 mmHg).
Statement 14 Conditional ยท Low certainty NEW 2026
For adults โ‰ฅ65 years: initial MAP range 60โ€“65 mmHg over higher ranges. (Permissive hypotension reduces vasopressor burden; meta-analysis showed reduced mortality in elderly)
Statement 42 Conditional ยท Very low certainty
Either invasive OR non-invasive BP monitoring acceptable. Changed from 2021 (EVERDAC trial: non-invasive non-inferior). Arterial line for: high-dose vasopressors, escalating doses, frequent ABGs.
Statement 55 Conditional โ€” over vasopressin/Ang II
Norepinephrine first-line vasopressor. Downgraded from Strong over vasopressin/Ang II | Still STRONG over dopamine, epinephrine, selepressin

D. Antimicrobials

Statement 16 Strong ยท Very low certainty
Administer antibiotics within 1 hour of recognising septic shock.
Statement 33 Strong ยท Moderate certainty Upgraded to Strong
Prolonged (extended) infusion of beta-lactams for maintenance after loading dose. Loading: 30 min; Maintenance: 3โ€“4h infusion. Maximises time above MIC for time-dependent antibiotics.
Statement 36 Strong ยท Very low certainty Upgraded to Strong
De-escalate antimicrobial therapy when confirmed microbiological diagnosis + susceptibility available.
Statement 28 Conditional NEW 2026
Without anaerobic infection risk factors: no anaerobic coverage in empirical regimen. Anaerobic risk: intra-abdominal, deep gynae/obstetric, necrotizing soft tissue, head/neck, CNS abscess.
Statement 27 Conditional ยท Low certainty
Against routine empirical antifungal. Changed from dual 2021 rec | Consider case-by-case: immunocompromised, prolonged antibiotics/hospitalisation, intra-abdominal source.

E. Adjuncts

Statement 79 Conditional ยท Low certainty
IV corticosteroids in septic shock. Certainty downgraded from Moderate | Trigger: NE โ‰ฅ0.25 mcg/kg/min. Dose: Hydrocortisone 50 mg IV q6h (200 mg/day) ร— 7 days. Marino (p.309): hastens shock reversal ~1.5 days but does NOT improve survival.
๐Ÿ’Š 4 ยท Drug Doses & Dilutions

Drug Doses, Ampoule Compositions & Dilutions

Per Marino 5th Ed Table 17.2 + SSC 2026 + ISCCM 2020. Doses based on Ideal Body Weight (IBW).

IBW (Devine): Male = 50 + 2.3 ร— (Ht inches โˆ’ 60) | Female = 45.5 + 2.3 ร— (Ht inches โˆ’ 60)
Rate (ml/hr) = Dose (mcg/kg/min) ร— IBW (kg) ร— 60 รท Concentration (mcg/ml)

DrugAmpouleStandard DilutionStarting DoseRangeWhen
Noradrenaline4 mg/4 ml4 mg in 46 ml NS = 80 mcg/ml0.05โ€“0.1 mcg/kg/min0.01โ€“3 mcg/kg/min1st line. Peripheral OK <12h.
Vasopressin20 IU/1 ml20 IU in 19 ml NS = 1 IU/ml โ†’ 1.8 ml/hr0.03 IU/min โ€” FIXED0.03 IU/min onlyNE >0.25 mcg/kg/min (Marino Table 17.2)
Adrenaline1 mg/ml (1:1000)5 mg in 45 ml NS = 100 mcg/ml0.05โ€“0.1 mcg/kg/min0.01โ€“1 mcg/kg/min3rd vasopressor (Marino Table 17.2)
Dobutamine250 mg/20 ml250 mg in 250 ml NS = 1000 mcg/ml2.5โ€“5 mcg/kg/min2.5โ€“20 mcg/kg/minLow CO: cold peripheries, ScvOโ‚‚ <65%, low EF on echo
Hydrocortisone100 mg vial200 mg in 50 ml NS = 4 mg/ml50 mg IV q6h200 mg/day ร— 7 daysNE โ‰ฅ0.25 mcg/kg/min (Marino p.309; SSC 2026)

NE Dose-to-Rate Table (80 mcg/ml solution)

Dose (mcg/kg/min)50 kg60 kg70 kg80 kgClinical Note
0.051.9 ml/hr2.3 ml/hr2.6 ml/hr3.0 ml/hrStarting dose
0.13.8 ml/hr4.5 ml/hr5.3 ml/hr6.0 ml/hrUsual starting
0.259.4 ml/hr11.3 ml/hr13.1 ml/hr15.0 ml/hrADD vasopressin here (Marino + SSC 2026)
0.518.8 ml/hr22.5 ml/hr26.3 ml/hr30.0 ml/hrHigh dose โ€” refractory shock

Antibiotics โ€” Extended Infusion Protocol (SSC 2026 Strong Recommendation)

SourceLikely PathogenLoading Dose (30 min)Extended Infusion Maintenance
Septic shock โ€” unknown sourceGNB + MRSA riskMeropenem 1g IV over 30 min1g over 3h q8h + Vancomycin 25 mg/kg load if MRSA risk
Urosepsis โ€” ESBL+Klebsiella, E.coli ESBLMeropenem 1g IV over 30 min1g over 3h q8h (no metronidazole โ€” no anaerobic risk)
HAP/VAP โ€” MDRPseudomonas, AcinetobacterPip-Taz 4.5g IV over 30 min4.5g over 4h q6h
Abdominal sepsisGNB + AnaerobesMeropenem 1g IV over 30 min1g over 3h q8h (Meropenem covers anaerobes)
XDR AcinetobacterAcinetobacter XDRColistin 9 MIU IV loadColistin 4.5 MIU q12h + Meropenem 2g over 3h q8h
๐Ÿ—บ 5 ยท Clinical Flowchart

Step-by-Step Clinical Algorithm

Based on Marino 5th Ed Table 17.2 + SSC 2026 Statements 10, 13, 55 + ISCCM 2020

1

Recognition โ€” Screen with NEWS2/MEWS

Suspected infection + NEWS2 โ‰ฅ5 OR qSOFA โ‰ฅ2 โ†’ Sepsis Alert. Septic shock = vasopressors needed + lactate >2 mmol/L despite fluids. Begin resuscitation immediately โ€” do not sequence, do simultaneously.

2

Hour-1 Bundle (All 5 Simultaneously)

  • Blood cultures ร— 2 before antibiotics (aerobic + anaerobic, 2 sites)
  • Lactate โ€” if >2 mmol/L: re-measure at 2h; if >4: high risk regardless of BP
  • Antibiotics within 1 hour (septic shock) โ€” see drug table above
  • Crystalloid 30 ml/kg IBW IV if MAP <65 or SBP <90 or lactate โ‰ฅ4
  • Vasopressors if MAP <65 during/after fluids โ€” peripheral start is OK (SSC 2026)
3

Vasopressor Escalation (per Marino Table 17.2 + SSC 2026)

Step 1: Noradrenaline โ†’ titrate to MAP 65โ€“70 (60โ€“65 if age โ‰ฅ65 โ€” NEW SSC 2026)
Step 2: NE >0.25 mcg/kg/min โ†’ add Vasopressin 0.03 IU/min (FIXED dose)
Step 3: Still refractory โ†’ add Adrenaline + Hydrocortisone 200 mg/day
Step 4: Echo: low EF + cold extremities + ScvOโ‚‚ <65% โ†’ add Dobutamine 5 mcg/kg/min

4

Fluid Reassessment (Beyond 30 ml/kg)

Use dynamic parameters: Passive Leg Raise (CO โ†‘ โ‰ฅ10% = fluid responsive) | PPV โ‰ฅ13% (ventilated, SR) | IVC collapsibility >50%. Avoid fluid overload โ€” target neutral balance from 24โ€“48h after stabilisation (Marino Ch.11).

5

Antibiotic Strategy (SSC 2026)

Loading dose (30 min) โ†’ Switch to extended infusion (3โ€“4h) = STRONG REC. Review cultures at 48โ€“72h โ†’ de-escalate (STRONG REC). No routine anaerobic coverage unless risk factors. Duration: 7 days adequate for most. PCT-guided de-escalation where available.

6

Monitoring Targets

MAP 65โ€“70 (60โ€“65 if โ‰ฅ65 yrs) | Lactate clearance โ‰ฅ10%/2h, target <2 mmol/L | UO >0.5 ml/kg/hr | Glucose 140โ€“180 mg/dL | Temperature 36โ€“38ยฐC | SOFA trending down daily | PCT declining (guides antibiotic duration)

7

Deresuscitation (NEW SSC 2026 Statement 89)

Once haemodynamically stable (off or low vasopressors): furosemide 40โ€“80 mg IV to achieve negative fluid balance. Fluid overload (>10% body weight gain) independently increases mortality. Target neutral/negative balance from 24โ€“48h after stabilisation.

โš ๏ธ 6 ยท Common Mistakes

Common Mistakes โ€” What NOT to Do

โŒ Mistake 1 โ€” Waiting for CVC Before Starting Vasopressors

SSC 2026 explicitly: start noradrenaline peripherally (antecubital/wrist). Do not delay 30 minutes inserting a CVC while MAP is 50. Peripheral NE is safe โ‰ค12h with site monitoring q30 min.

โŒ Mistake 2 โ€” Using Dopamine as First-Line

SOAP II (De Backer NEJM 2010): dopamine โ†’ more arrhythmias (24% vs 12%); worse mortality in cardiogenic shock subgroup. SSC 2026: STRONG recommendation for NE over dopamine. Marino (p.308) also endorses this.

โŒ Mistake 3 โ€” Titrating Vasopressin Dose Up

Vasopressin = 0.03 IU/min ONLY (fixed). Increasing dose causes catastrophic mesenteric + coronary ischaemia, skin necrosis. It is not titrated โ€” it is on or off. (Marino Table 17.2; SSC 2026)

โŒ Mistake 4 โ€” Giving Albumin Routinely

SSC 2026 CHANGED: crystalloids alone preferred (moderate certainty). Updated meta-analysis: albumin has no mortality benefit in sepsis. Use only if: cirrhosis or already gave large crystalloid volumes. Avoid in TBI.

โŒ Mistake 5 โ€” Not De-escalating Antibiotics at 48โ€“72h

SSC 2026 UPGRADED to STRONG recommendation. Culture results at 48โ€“72h โ†’ narrow spectrum. 14-day courses cause CDiff, AMR, nephrotoxicity without benefit. 7 days adequate for most infections.

โŒ Mistake 6 โ€” Using ScvOโ‚‚ as Resuscitation Endpoint

Marino (Ch.17 p.307): mitochondrial dysfunction โ†’ โ†“ Oโ‚‚ extraction โ†’ ScvOโ‚‚ inappropriately ELEVATED. ScvOโ‚‚ is unreliable in sepsis. Use lactate clearance (โ‰ฅ10%/2h) as the primary resuscitation endpoint instead.

โŒ Mistake 7 โ€” Routine Anaerobic Coverage for All Sepsis

NEW SSC 2026: no anaerobic coverage unless specific risk factors. Lung/urinary/unknown source sepsis does NOT need metronidazole. Unnecessary = hepatotoxicity + CDiff risk + AMR selection.

โŒ Mistake 8 โ€” Liberal Supplemental Oโ‚‚ to "Promote Tissue Oxygenation"

Marino (Ch.17 p.307): tissue Oโ‚‚ is NOT impaired in sepsis โ€” mitochondria cannot use it. Liberal supplemental Oโ‚‚ in normoxic sepsis is NOT justified and is potentially harmful (oxidant stress). Target SpOโ‚‚ 92โ€“96% only.

๐ŸŽ“ 7 ยท Exam Pearls โ€” DrNB / PDCC / IFCCM / EDIC

Exam Pearls

Q: Define sepsis vs septic shock (Sepsis-3, 2016).
Sepsis = life-threatening organ dysfunction (SOFA โ‰ฅ2) from dysregulated host response to infection. Septic shock = sepsis + vasopressors to maintain MAP โ‰ฅ65 + lactate >2 mmol/L despite adequate fluids. Mortality: sepsis ~15%; septic shock >40%.

Q: SSC 2026 โ€” which screening tool is now recommended over qSOFA?
NEWS, NEWS2, MEWS, or SIRS (Strong recommendation, moderate certainty). qSOFA is a prognostic tool โ€” it predicts ICU admission/death but misses ~40% of sepsis at presentation. Four systematic reviews confirmed EWS scores are more sensitive.

Q: NEW SSC 2026 โ€” MAP target for patients โ‰ฅ65 years in septic shock?
60โ€“65 mmHg (Conditional recommendation, low certainty). NEW in 2026. Meta-analysis: lower target associated with reduced mortality in elderly. Less vasopressor exposure without harming organ perfusion.

Q: Per Marino 5th Ed โ€” why is lactate elevated in septic shock? Is it anaerobic?
NO. Marino (Ch.17, p.307): mitochondrial dysfunction (pyruvate dehydrogenase inhibition + oxidative damage to electron transport chain) โ†’ โ†“ mitochondrial Oโ‚‚ consumption โ†’ lactate is produced as alternative energy source during metabolic stress. It does NOT indicate tissue hypoxia. Tissue POโ‚‚ is actually elevated in sepsis.

Q: Extended infusion of beta-lactams โ€” what grade in SSC 2026? Why?
STRONG recommendation (moderate certainty) โ€” upgraded from Conditional in 2021. Loading dose (30 min) โ†’ maintenance by 3โ€“4h infusion. Beta-lactams are time-dependent antibiotics: keeping drug levels above MIC for longer = better bactericidal effect.

Q: What changed about albumin in SSC 2026?
Changed from 2021. Now: crystalloids ALONE preferred (Conditional, moderate certainty). Updated meta-analysis: albumin has no effect on sepsis mortality. Exceptions: large crystalloid volumes already given; cirrhosis. Always avoid albumin in TBI.

Q: Trigger and dose for hydrocortisone in septic shock (Marino + SSC 2026)?
Trigger: NE โ‰ฅ0.25 mcg/kg/min (SSC 2026) or NE โ‰ฅ0.25โ€“0.5 mcg/kg/min (Marino Table 17.2). Dose: Hydrocortisone 50 mg IV q6h (= 200 mg/day) ร— 7 days. Marino (p.309): hastens shock reversal ~1.5 days but does NOT improve survival rate.

Q: Why is ScvOโ‚‚ unreliable in septic shock? (Marino insight)
Marino Ch.17: mitochondrial dysfunction โ†’ โ†“ Oโ‚‚ extraction from microcirculation โ†’ ScvOโ‚‚ is inappropriately ELEVATED (not because Oโ‚‚ delivery is adequate, but because the mitochondria cannot use it). Use lactate clearance โ‰ฅ10%/2h as the reliable resuscitation target instead.

๐Ÿ“š 8 ยท References

References

  1. Marino PL. Marino's The ICU Book, 5th edition. Chapter 17: Inflammatory Shock Syndromes (pp.300โ€“319). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2025. ISBN: 978-1-975176-71-6.
  2. Marino PL. Marino's The ICU Book, 5th edition. Chapter 14: Approaches to Clinical Shock (pp.249โ€“272). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2025.
  3. Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026. Crit Care Med. 2026;54(4):725โ€“812.
  4. Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W, et al. Executive Summary: Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2026. Crit Care Med. 2026;54(4):715โ€“724.
  5. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801โ€“810.
  6. Myatra SN, et al. ISCCM Position Statement on Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(S1):S1โ€“S28.
  7. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock (SOAP II). N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):779โ€“789.
  8. Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, et al. Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine in Septic Shock (VASST). N Engl J Med. 2008;358(9):877โ€“887.
  9. Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C, et al. Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock (APROCCHSS). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):809โ€“818.
  10. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1283โ€“1297.
  11. Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults (SMART). N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):829โ€“839.
  12. Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, et al. High versus Low Blood-Pressure Target in Septic Shock (SEPSISPAM). N Engl J Med. 2014;370(17):1583โ€“1593.
  13. Washington Manual of Critical Care, 4th Edition. Kollef MH, Witt CA (eds). Chapter: Sepsis and Septic Shock. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2023.
  14. Oh TE (ed). Oh's Intensive Care Manual, 8th edition. Chapters 65โ€“67: Sepsis and SIRS. Elsevier; 2018.