📊 Airway Scores

Mallampati old & modified Cormack–Lehane upgraded Composite scores
📊 Airway Scores — Values & Difficulty

What each measurement means, and the threshold that flags difficulty. Assess these at the bedside (see the Assessment tab).

Mallampati — original vs modified

Mallampati's original 1985 description had three classes; Samsoon & Young added a fourth in 1987, giving the modified Mallampati classification used today. Know both — the distinction is a classic viva question.

Modified Mallampati classes I to IV
Modified Mallampati classes I–IV (Samsoon & Young). Class IV — only the hard palate — was the addition to Mallampati's original three classes.
Jmarchn, Wikimedia Commons — CC BY-SA 3.0.
ClassOriginal Mallampati 1985 (3 classes)Modified — Samsoon & Young 1987 (4 classes)
ISoft palate, fauces, uvula & pillarsSoft palate, fauces, uvula & pillars
IISoft palate, fauces & uvulaSoft palate, fauces & uvula (tip may be masked)
IIISoft palate only (uvula base)Soft palate & base of uvula only
IV— not described —Hard palate only (added class)

Technique: patient sitting, mouth maximally open, tongue fully protruded, no phonation. Classes III–IV predict difficulty. Phonation or the supine position falsely improves the class.

Single bedside tests — thresholds

TestGrades / valuesPredicts difficulty when…
Modified MallampatiI → IV (above)III–IV
Inter-incisor gapNormal >5 cm / 3 fingers<3 cm (difficult DL); <2 cm (difficult LMA)
Thyromental distance>6.5 cm reassuring6–6.5 cm difficult but possible; <6 cm may be impossible
Sternomental distanceSternal notch → chin, neck extended<12.5 cm
Hyomental distanceGr I >6 cm · II 4–6 cm · III <4 cmGrade III (<4 cm)
Upper-lip-bite testI: bite above vermilion · II: below · III: cannot reachClass III
Mandibular protrusion (Prayer/ULBT)A: lower teeth beyond upper · B: edge-to-edge · C: cannotClass B / C
Neck / atlanto-occipital extensionNormal ≈35°≥⅓–⅔ reduction of extension

Cormack–Lehane laryngoscopic grade — upgraded

The original 1984 grade (I–IV) has been refined by the Cook (2000) modification, which splits the ambiguous middle grades and groups the view by how you should act — easy → restricted → difficult.

Cormack–Lehane grades I to IV at laryngoscopy
Cormack–Lehane grades at laryngoscopy (I–IV).
User:Tubus, Wikimedia Commons — CC BY-SA 3.0.
GradeLaryngoscopic viewGroup / difficulty
1Most of the glottis / full cordsEasy
2aPartial view of the cordsEasy
2bArytenoids / posterior cords onlyRestricted (intubation harder)
3aEpiglottis only — liftableDifficult (bougie may succeed)
3bEpiglottis only — adherent to pharynxDifficult
4Neither epiglottis nor glottisVery difficult
📐 Reporting the view — the modern additions

Composite / multivariable scores

ScoreWhat it combinesCut-off for difficulty
Wilson risk scoreWeight, head-&-neck movement, jaw movement, receding mandible, buck teeth (each 0–2)Total ≥2 (of 10) predicts difficult intubation
El-Ganzouri / Simplified Airway Risk Index (SARI)Mouth opening, thyromental distance, Mallampati, neck movement, jaw protrusion, weight, history of difficult intubation (0–12)≥4 suggests difficulty
LEMON score1 point each: Look, 3-3-2 abnormal, Mallampati ≥3, Obstruction, Neck immobilityHigher score → higher risk (used in the ED)
Arné scorePathology, prior difficulty, symptoms, Mallampati, TMD, mouth opening, neck movement≥11 predicts difficulty

Bottom line: composites improve on any single test but none is perfect — always prepare for the airway you did not predict.

← Back🔎 Assessment Next →🧰 Devices & Definitions